If almost four hours on the topic of institutional reforms to combat polarization and extremism is too much (and understandably so!), the good folks at Reform Elections Now kindly hosted a 90-minute webinar on the new book co-edited by Larry Diamond, Rick Pildes, and me. I thought the discussion a particularly useful one. Based on helpful input from the webinar’s organizers, I focused my remarks on the more practical aspects of the book’s research and analysis. (My part starts at about 13 minutes in.) Specifically, I discuss how this year’s US Senate election in Ohio would have had a very different outcome if a Top-3 Condorcet system had been used: non-MAGA traditional Republican candidate Matt Dolan, endorsed by Governor Mike DeWine and former Senator Rob Portman, would have won, rather than the Trump-endorsed MAGA candidate Bernie Moreno. I went on to explain that the prospects for achieving electoral reform along these lines would be most likely in red-leaning states that permit citizen-initiated ballot measures, like Ohio, Missouri and Nebraska. In those states, Democrats would be well-served to enter a reform coalition with non-MAGA Republicans, since Democrats are unable to win statewide elections there, and in a Top-3 Condorcet system Democrats at least could assure that more palatable non-MAGA Republicans would prevail. The Q&A usefully pursued the best way to market this kind of reform.
Discussion about this post
No posts